Validation
Here is a technically robust and professionally structured Validation Document for the use of thermal imagery as a valid method for temperature monitoring and recordkeeping at Critical Control Points (CCPs) within a Food Safety Management System (FSMS). This document includes methodology, calibration standards, sample validation design, and FSMS-aligned justification for its adoption and reliance.
Food Safety Management System (FSMS) – Validation Documentation
1. Purpose
This document outlines the validation methodology and evidence base for the use of infrared thermal imaging as a primary method for monitoring and recording temperature data at designated Critical Control Points (CCPs) in accordance with HACCP principles, ISO 22000, and regulatory expectations.
Given the high level of reliance on temperature data generated by thermal imaging for compliance at CCPs such as cooking, hot holding, cold holding, time control, and incoming goods, this validation aims to:
Demonstrate the accuracy and repeatability of thermal temperature readings
Establish confidence in the data used for decision-making and audit evidence
Confirm that thermal imaging is a fit-for-purpose monitoring method under the FSMS
2. Scope
This validation applies to:
All thermal cameras and sensors used within the facility or mobile inspection units
Image-based temperature capture workflows processed via the Didge Platform
CCPs relying on thermal data including:
CCP #1: Incoming Goods
CCP #3: Cooking (surface temperature of wet dishes)
CCP #4: Time Control (initial temperature verification)
CCP #5: Hot Holding
CCP #6: Cold Holding
3. Validation Objectives
Ensure that the temperature readings from thermal imagery fall within ±1.0°C of a NATA-traceable reference device
Validate AI-supported field population and timestamp integrity in the Didge Platform
Confirm that the image-to-data pipeline is repeatable and suitable for audit recordkeeping
Validate against a real-world operational environment (not lab-only conditions)
4. Calibration Standard
4.1 Calibration Device Requirements
All thermal cameras used must be:
Calibrated against a NATA-certified thermal black body or equivalent traceable reference device
Subject to three-point calibration at:
0°C (chilled)
50°C (intermediate)
100°C (high-temperature end)
Maintained with calibration certificates and recalibrated:
Every 6 months, or
After any impact or device update
4.2 Calibration Tolerance
Permitted variance: ±1.0°C across all validation points
5. Validation Methodology
5.1 Sample Size and Test Design
Minimum test sample:
30 samples per CCP type, with a mix of foods and surface conditions
Test conditions must represent:
Actual service trays, cooking vessels, delivery boxes, hot boxes, cold wells, etc.
5.2 Validation Procedure
For each CCP:
Capture a thermal image using the operational camera
Immediately capture a reference temperature at the same point using a calibrated NATA-traceable thermometer
Record:
Thermal reading from image
Reference temperature
Image file and submission timestamp
AI-populated data from the Didge Platform
Repeat across:
Different ambient environments
Multiple operators
Varied food types (wet, dense, light, complex surfaces)
5.3 Analysis
Compare all thermal readings against the reference thermometer
Calculate:
Mean deviation
Maximum deviation
Pass/fail rate under ±1.0°C margin
5.4 Acceptance Criteria
≥ 95% of thermal readings must be within ±1.0°C of the reference reading
AI field completion must match operator input in ≥ 90% of cases
Time stamps must align within ±1 minute of image capture
6. FSMS Validation Findings Template
The full validation dataset with 30 samples per CCP type is seen in the table above. Each record includes:
Food type
CCP category (Cooking, Cold Holding, Hot Holding)
Reference temperature (from calibrated probe)
Thermal image temperature
Deviation (±°C)
Pass/Fail result based on ±1.0°C tolerance
7. Risk Considerations and Controls
Surface temperature limitation:
This method is only valid for items where surface temperature is representative of food safety, such as:
Wet dishes (curries, soups)
Chilled foods in direct contact with air (salads, desserts)
Not valid for internal temperatures of solid roasts or deep trays
Operator variability:
Validation must assess consistency across multiple users
Environment effects:
Account for air movement, humidity, surface moisture, and reflection
8. System-Level Validation
Each submission includes:
Timestamp and device ID
Thermal image stored with temperature data
Location or operation context
AI-generated food type, category, and serving conditions
These records are:
Immutable
Time-synced
Searchable and exportable (PDF, CSV, Excel)
Suitable for audit and regulatory demonstration
9. Conclusion & Validation Statement
Based on the above validation framework, if results meet the acceptance criteria, thermal imagery is confirmed as a valid, FSMS-compliant method for:
Temperature monitoring at CCPs
Auto-populated food safety records
Supporting both real-time decision making and retrospective audit traceability
Once validated, this method is to be incorporated into the HACCP plan and reviewed annually or following any of the following:
Hardware/software updates
Operational scope changes
Corrective actions resulting from deviation events
Last updated
Was this helpful?
